Reviewer Guidelines

Article Content Review
Reviewers are tasked with reviewing articles according to standard article components. If the content of an article deviates significantly, please write your comments.

  1. Title: The title should adequately describe the subject of the manuscript in a clear, precise, and unambiguous manner. Please suggest a title if necessary.
  2. Abstract: The abstract should briefly state the purpose of the research, the methods used, the results, and the key conclusions. Please remember that the abstract is the most widely read part of a scientific article.
  3. Introduction: The introduction should explain the accuracy of the issues raised by the author and clearly state the issues under consideration. The introduction should summarize the relevant research context and explain any research findings or other results, if any, offered for discussion.
  4. Method: The methods used to achieve the objectives must be described accurately and in sufficient detail to enable competent readers to replicate the work performed by the author. The tools, materials, hardware/software platforms, and frameworks used in the research must also be described.
  5. Results and Discussion: The author should explain the findings of the study. These should be organized and presented in a logical order. Reviewers need to consider whether appropriate analysis has been performed, including the use of statistical tools, etc. Are the claims in this section supported by fair and reasonable results? Does the author compare the results of the study with previous studies? Do the results of the study described in the article support or contradict previous theories?
  6. Conclusion: The conclusion to answer the hypothesis must be stated adequately and clearly and must be supported by data and testing.
  7. Text Relevance to Tables and Figures: All tables and figures must be referenced in the text/paragraphs. Statements in the text must correspond to the content of the tables and figures.
  8. Table and Figure Titles: Titles should describe the content. Please provide suggestions for improving the quality of table/figure titles.
  9. The titles in the interpretation table must be clear and concise and use the correct units.
  10. Graphics: Data for presenting graphics/images must be accurate.
  11. References: All references in the manuscript must be included in the Bibliography. There must be a minimum of 10 references, with 60% being primary references (scientific journals, conference proceedings, reference books, theses/dissertations) published within the last 10 (ten) years.

Delivering Review Results

Once you are ready to conduct a review, you can download the article file and additional files. You can fill out the review form or comments or upload files for the editor and/or author regarding your review results. You are expected to provide recommendations regarding the quality of the article. Reviews must be completed within two weeks. If you need more time, you can notify the Editor via the email provided.